{"id":1907,"date":"2024-02-21T08:08:42","date_gmt":"2024-02-21T08:08:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/?p=1907"},"modified":"2024-02-21T08:09:26","modified_gmt":"2024-02-21T08:09:26","slug":"gemini-vs-gpt-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/gemini-vs-gpt-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Gemini 1.5 vs GPT-4: Is ChatGPT Falling Behind?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Both Gemini 1.5 and GPT 4 have taken the world of Generative AI by storm with their latest updates. Developers across the world now want to maximize their full potential and explore all their use cases.\u00a0Here in this blog, we will compare the benchmarks of the Gemini 1.5 vs GPT-4 and see which tool is better suited for developers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Gemini 1.5 Pro Has a Large Contextual Window<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>OpenAI completely transformed the scenery of Generative AI with the release of <a href=\"https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/sora-ai-video-generator-openai\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Sora\u2019s text-to-video<\/a> cutting-edge technology. However, Google came back right into the scene with the release of Gemini 1.5, the latest upgrade to its rebranded version of Bard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Gemini 1.5 Pro comes with the largest contextual window with 1 million tokens. It highly surpasses ChatGPT\u2019s token count of 128k.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"668\" src=\"https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Google-Gemini-1.5-Pro-1-Million-Tokens-1024x668.jpg\" alt=\"Google Gemini 1.5 Pro 1 Million Tokens\" class=\"wp-image-1908\" srcset=\"https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Google-Gemini-1.5-Pro-1-Million-Tokens-1024x668.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Google-Gemini-1.5-Pro-1-Million-Tokens-300x196.jpg 300w, https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Google-Gemini-1.5-Pro-1-Million-Tokens-768x501.jpg 768w, https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Google-Gemini-1.5-Pro-1-Million-Tokens-750x489.jpg 750w, https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Google-Gemini-1.5-Pro-1-Million-Tokens-1140x743.jpg 1140w, https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Google-Gemini-1.5-Pro-1-Million-Tokens.jpg 1190w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>With a context window surpassing all its predecessors, Gemini possesses the ability to take in more information and process it in a given prompt. The vast amounts of information can range from 1 hour of video to even 11 hours of audio.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.google\/technology\/ai\/google-gemini-next-generation-model-february-2024\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">a latest blog<\/a>, the CEO of Google said:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>This new generation also delivers a breakthrough in long-context understanding. We\u2019ve been able to significantly increase the amount of information our models can process \u2014 running up to 1 million tokens consistently, achieving the longest context window of any large-scale foundation model yet.<\/p>\n<cite>-Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google and Alphabet CEO<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Therefore, developers looking to process vast sources of information in a shorter time must stick to Gemini 1.5 Pro. Its high-performance capabilities will allow developers to work with different forms of input media such as words, images, videos, and audio. They can also expect more relevant, consistent, and useful processed output as compared to before.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Audio and Video Processing<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Even after following Sora\u2019s release of cutting-edge text-to-video technology, it has been observed that Gemini 1.5 possesses a better understanding of video and audio multimedia.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It indicates a better sense of understanding and analyzing video captioning and video question answering, two of the key aspects in generating content from video data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It also surpasses GPT 4 in audio processing, showcasing its superiority in understanding and translating spoken language. The data is obtained from the <a href=\"https:\/\/storage.googleapis.com\/deepmind-media\/gemini\/gemini_v1_5_report.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">official Google technical paper<\/a> and study by <a href=\"https:\/\/bito.ai\/blog\/gemini-1-5-pro-vs-gpt-4-turbo-benchmarks\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">bito.ai<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Video Understanding:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Benchmark<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Gemini 1.5<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>GPT-4 Turbo<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Description<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>VATEX<\/td><td>63%<\/td><td>56%<\/td><td>English Video Captioning<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Perception Text MCQA<\/td><td>56.2%<\/td><td>46.3%<\/td><td>Video Question Answering<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Audio Processing:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-center\" data-align=\"center\"><strong>Benchmark<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Gemini 1.5<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>GPT-4 Turbo<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Description<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-center\" data-align=\"center\">CoVoST 2<\/td><td>40.1%<\/td><td>29.1%<\/td><td>Automatic Speech Translation<\/td><\/tr><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-center\" data-align=\"center\">FLEURS<\/td><td>6.6%<\/td><td>17.6%<\/td><td>Automatic Speech Recognition<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>If you are a developer looking to generate factual information and derive information from video and audio multimedia, Gemini seems a better option for now at least.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>General and Mathematical Reasoning<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>When it comes to comprehension of the subject matter, Gemini 1.5 slightly outperforms GPT 4 when it comes to generating subjective content and detailed answers.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, it falls behind GPT 4 when it comes to reading comprehension and analyzing commonsense reasoning for everyday tasks. GPT 4 also outshines Gemini when it comes to complex mathematical concepts and its nuanced understanding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>General Reasoning and Comprehension:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-center\" data-align=\"center\"><strong>Benchmark<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Gemini 1.5<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>GPT-4 Turbo<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Description<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-center\" data-align=\"center\">MMLU<\/td><td>81.9%<\/td><td>80.48%<\/td><td>Multitask Language Understanding<\/td><\/tr><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-center\" data-align=\"center\">Big-Bench Hard<\/td><td>84%<\/td><td>83.90%<\/td><td>Multi-Step Reasoning Task<\/td><\/tr><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-center\" data-align=\"center\">DROP<\/td><td>78.9%<\/td><td>83%<\/td><td>Reading Comprehension<\/td><\/tr><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-center\" data-align=\"center\">HellaSwag<\/td><td>92.5%<\/td><td>96%<\/td><td>Common Sense Reasoning for Everyday Tasks<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Mathematical Reasoning:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Benchmark<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Gemini 1.5<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>GPT-4 Turbo<\/strong><\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-center\" data-align=\"center\"><strong>Description<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>GSM8K<\/td><td>91.7%<\/td><td>92.95%<\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-center\" data-align=\"center\">Basic Arithmetic and Grade School Math Problems<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>MATH<\/td><td>58.5%<\/td><td>54%<\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-center\" data-align=\"center\">Advance Math Problems<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Take a look at this post from X, where a user can be seen asking a similar question to both Gemini and GPT:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div align=\"center\"><blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Gemini vs GPT-4 settled for good. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/hCzU7Uap92\" target=\"_blank\">pic.twitter.com\/hCzU7Uap92<\/a><\/p>&mdash; Emsi (@emsi_kil3r) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/emsi_kil3r\/status\/1758551981969305732?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">February 16, 2024<\/a><\/blockquote> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Gemini provides a better-detailed explanation but yet makes a very silly mistake in describing its appearance. GPT\u2019s answer may not be elongated but it simply represents the required information correctly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Code Generation<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Here comes the X factor that every developer is looking for. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>GPT 4 still outperforms Gemini 1.5 when it comes to generating optimal code snippets.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>All developers would want a tool that not only generates code but makes it optimal, robust, and most importantly highly accurate. The tool better suited for those operations would be GPT 4, whose benchmarks show a higher capacity for Python code generation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td>Benchmark<\/td><td>Gemini 1.5<\/td><td>GPT-4 Turbo<\/td><td>Description<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>HumanEval<\/td><td>71.9%<\/td><td>73.17%<\/td><td>Python code generation<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Natural2Code<\/td><td>77.7%<\/td><td>75%<\/td><td>Python code generation, new dataset<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Yet, Gemini still possesses a higher dataset for code generation thanks to its recent upgrade to 1 million tokens. Gemini 1.5 Pro shows remarkable accuracy in analyzing large datasets, with a 100% recall rate for up to 530,000 tokens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>When the dataset size is increased to one million tokens, its accuracy marginally decreases to 99.7%, but it still maintains an astoundingly high 99.2% accuracy for datasets up to ten million tokens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Now it\u2019s up to developers to see for themselves which aspect of code they want to focus on. If you want clarity and accuracy, go for GPT 4. If you instead prefer diverse dataset codes with longer blocks, the answer is Gemini 1.5.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Is Gemini 1.5 better than GPT 4?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Based on the above research obtained from various sources, it\u2019s hard to just say which tool is better than the other. The answer more or less depends on what users need and what type of tool functions they are looking to utilize.<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Gemini 1.5 is promising when you are looking for text and content across various modalities. It can also work with various forms of multimedia such as images, texts, videos, and audio which can help in providing a more comprehensive and factual understanding of the subject matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, GPT 4 is suited to other forms of developer needs such as Code Generation with accuracy, clarity, and robustness. And we must not forget that Sora AI still holds the ominous power of text-to-video generation which not only developers but firms and enterprises worldwide also can\u2019t wait to get their hands on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Both Gemini 1.5 and GPT-4 are excellent advancements in the world of Generative AI. Both tools are still limited to a few tech enthusiasts and enterprises we must be patient before we derive an absolute opinion on which one performs better. As of now, they are quite impressive and are fulfilling the users\u2019 demands in a mutually exclusive manner.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Find out the key differences between Google&#8217;s Gemini 1.5 and OpenAI&#8217;s GPT-4. Also, Is Gemini better than ChatGPT now?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":1909,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":null,"jnews_primary_category":{"id":"","hide":""},"footnotes":""},"categories":[57],"tags":[56,61,64,58,63,60],"class_list":["post-1907","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ai","tag-ai","tag-chatgpt","tag-gemini","tag-google","tag-gpt","tag-openai"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1907","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1907"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1907\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1914,"href":"https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1907\/revisions\/1914"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1909"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1907"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1907"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/favtutor.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1907"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}